Browse Undergrad Subjects

     A 

Abortion
Accounting
Advertising
Africa
African-American Studies
Aging
Agriculture
American Indian Studies
Anthropology
Archaeology
Architecture
Argumentative
Art: Artists (Alphabetized)
Art: General
Become an Affiliate and Earn $$$
Biographies (Alphabetized)
Book Reviews (Non-Fiction) (Alphabetized)
Business: Companies (Alphabetized)
Business: General
Business: Industries (Alphabetized)
Business: International
Business: Small
California
Canada
Caribbean
Child Abuse
China
Communication: Journalism
Communication: Language & Speech
Communication: Media
Communication: Non-Verbal
Communication: Television
Communication: Television & Children
Communism
Computer Science
Consumerism
Criminal Justice: General
Criminal Justice: Juvenile Delinquency
Criminal Justice: Police Science
Criminal Justice: Prisons
Cuba
Death & Dying: Euthanasia
Death & Dying: General
Death & Dying: Suicide
Drama: American
Drama: English
Drama: World
Drugs: Alcohol
Drugs: General
Economics: Banking
Economics: Economists (Alphabetized)
Economics: General
Economics: Inflation
Economics: International Trade
Economics: Macroeconomics
Economics: Microeconomics
Economics: Taxation
Education: Administration
Education: Curriculum
Education: General
Education: Higher
Education: Physical
Education: Psychology
Education: Reading
Education: Special
Education: Teaching Methods
Education: Theory
Energy: General
Energy: Nuclear
Energy: Solar
Environmental Studies
Evolution
Family & Marriage
Films: Artists (Alphabetized)
Films: General
Finance: Companies (Alphabetized)
Finance: General
Former Soviet Union: Post-1990
France
Gender & Sexuality
Geography
Germany
History: Ancient Greek & Roman
History: European
History: Great Britain
History: U.S. (After 1865)
History: U.S. (Before 1865)
History: U.S. Presidency
History: U.S. Presidents (Alphabetized)
Homosexuality
Immigration
India
Indonesia
International Relations: Arms Control
International Relations: Cold War
International Relations: Non-U.S.
International Relations: U.S.
Japan
Jewish Studies
Korea
Labor
Latin America
Law: Business
Law: Capital Punishment
Law: General
Law: International & Non-U.S.
Law: Supreme Court
Leadership
Literature, American: Authors (Alphabetized)
Literature, American: Faulkner
Literature, American: Fitzgerald
Literature, American: General
Literature, American: Hawthorne
Literature, American: Hemingway
Literature, American: Melville
Literature, American: Poe
Literature, American: Steinbeck
Literature, American: Twain
Literature, English: Authors (Alphabetized)
Literature, English: Chaucer
Literature, English: Conrad
Literature, English: Dickens
Literature, English: General
Literature, English: Joyce
Literature, English: Lawrence
Literature, English: Shakespeare
Literature, English: Swift
Literature, General: Children
Literature, General: Classic (Greek & Roman)
Literature, General: Russian
Literature, General: World
Management: General
Management: Japanese
Management: Motivation
Management: Theory
Management: Women
Marketing: Companies (Alphabetized)
Marketing: General
Marketing: Plans
Mathematics
Medical: Aids
Medical: Dentistry
Medical: Diseases & Disorders (Alphabetized)
Medical: General
Medical: Nursing
Mexican-American Studies
Mexico
Middle East: Egypt
Middle East: General
Middle East: O.P.E.C.
Military
Music: Classical
Music: General
Mythology
Nutrition
Parapsychology/Occult
Philosophy: Ancient Greek
Philosophy: Descartes
Philosophy: Eastern
Philosophy: General
Philosophy: Kant
Philosophy: Sartre
Poetry: American
Poetry: English
Poetry: Milton
Poetry: World
Political Science: Elections & Campaigns
Political Science: Foreign
Political Science: Lobbyists & Pressure Groups
Political Science: Machiavelli
Political Science: Mill
Political Science: Political Theory
Political Science: U.S.
Psychology: Behaviorism
Psychology: Child & Adolescent
Psychology: Disorders
Psychology: Dreams
Psychology: Experimental
Psychology: Freud
Psychology: General
Psychology: Jung
Psychology: Physiology
Psychology: Piaget
Psychology: Rogers
Psychology: Social
Psychology: Testing
Psychology: Therapies
Public Administration: General
Public Administration: Government Agencies (Alphabetized)
Racism
Real Estate
Recreation & Leisure
Religion: Eastern
Religion: General
Religion: Islam
Religion: The Bible
Research: Completed Studies (With Statistics & Results)
Research: Designs & Proposals
Research: Statistics & Methodology
Russia: Pre-1917 Revolution
Science: Astronomy
Science: Biology
Science: General
Science: Genetics
Sociology: Durkheim
Sociology: General
Sociology: Marx
Sociology: Social Problems
Sociology: Social Theory
Sociology: Social Welfare
Sociology: Weber
Soviet Union: 1917-1990
Sports: Drugs
Sports: General
Technology
Transportation: Automotive
Transportation: Aviation
Transportation: General
Transportation: Railroads
Urban Studies
Vietnam
Women Studies
 

SPANKING CHILDREN.
  Term Paper ID:28430
Essay Subject:
Argues it is immoral; creates a fearful, angry environment; does not teach children lessons of right & wrong.... More...
4 Pages / 900 Words
4 sources, 15 Citations, MLA Format
$16.00

Return to List of Papers


Paper Abstract:
Argues it is immoral; creates a fearful, angry environment; does not teach children lessons of right & wrong.

Paper Introduction:
It is Immoral to Spank Children Spanking is one of the most common methods of discipline used by parents. Even though the very same parents do not condone hitting people, they believe that spanking is a quick and effective method for exterminating unwanted behavior or encouraging desired behavior (Ramsburg 1). Ironically, by using a violent and hurtful means of discipline, parents are instilling negative values in their children. Basically, it is immoral to spank children. Furthermore, the moral consequences of spanking children has lifelong adverse effects. For young children, parents are their primary role models. When parents spank their children, they send a powerful message to their children that violence is a way to respond to problems (Ramsburg 2). This causes children to learn that people can control the behav

Text of the Paper:
The entire text of the paper is shown below. However, the text is somewhat scrambled. We want to give you as much information as we possibly can about our papers and essays, but we cannot give them away for free. In the text below you will find that while disordered, many of the phrases are essentially intact. From this text you will be able to get a solid sense of the writing style, the concepts addressed, and the sources used in the research paper.


Using their words andaction, parents can establish firm limits and boundaries in theirrelationship with their children without the use of force. By acting as aloving and caring role model, parents can help their children navigatethrough the complexity of life so that they can grow up to become lovingindividuals (Straus 2). NeverHitAChild.Org. ("Child Corporal Punishment" 4). Detailed studies of murderers reveal the presenceof a childhood history of physical abuse. Online. Living in an oppressive environment, children will not be able to growand express themselves for fear of antagonizing their parents. Ultimately, all human beings, adults and children, deserve to betreated appropriately. In addition, there is a fine line between spanking as a form ofdiscipline and physical abuse. Laramie County Council for Prevention of Child Abuse. By using physical punishment, parentsexpose their children to complex emotions of "fear, shame, rage, hostilityself-destructiveness and betrayal that they can't yet resolve" ("ChildCorporal Punishment" 4). Parents who spank children believe that theyare justified in physically punishing their children with a "reasonable"amount of force. Beating the Devil Out of Them: Corporal Punishment in American Families. Children who are unable toreconcile their emotions grow up to become adults who are capable ofexpressing their frustration and misery by hurting others. A. Available: www.sisna.com/lcsd/Children.html 2 September 2 .Ramsburg, Dawn. As they growup, these children will believe that it is acceptable to hit the peoplethey love, in the name of love (Straus 1). In addition, young children who are spanked for bad behavior may noteven understand the reason for their punishment. Studies haveshown that children who are spanked "are four times more likely than non-spanked children to show high aggression" ("Five Good Reasons" 1).Therefore, by using physical punishment, parents are encouraging andteaching children to be violent. In a national study, it was found that childrenwho were not spanked learned to distinguish between right and wrong. For fear of humiliation and punishment,children are likely to engage in dishonest behavior to avoid being caughtat all costs (Ramsburg 2). TheInstitute for the Prevention of Child Abuse reported that 85 percent of allphysical abuse could be attributed to "some form of over-discipline throughthe use of corporal punishment" ("Child Corporal Punishment" 4). Children needto know that it is acceptable for human beings to make errors and beforgiven without physical punishment. (N/A: Lexington Books, 1994): 1-2. Everyyear, it is estimated that 35 children are killed by their parents in theU.S. The uniform punishment of spanking for a widerange of misbehavior does not help children distinguish between theseriousness of their actions so that they can grasp their significance.Instead of offering a learning experience, parents who spank their childrenonly succeed in humiliating them. Itis an act of violence that breeds more violence by transmitting values ofusing power to oppress vulnerable individuals. In the same way that adults are not allowed tocontrol other adults by physical punishment, adults should not have theright to impose their expectations on their children by spanking them. These parents believe that they can gauge the amount offorce that should be used. For young children, parents are their primary role models. Works Cited"Child Corporal Punishment: Spanking." N/A: 1-14. Thus, by spanking their children, parents are condoningthe behavior of hitting regardless of the fact that they tell theirchildren not to hit others ("Child Corporal Punishment" 4). Online. Even though the very same parents do not condone hitting people,they believe that spanking is a quick and effective method forexterminating unwanted behavior or encouraging desired behavior (Ramsburg1). Parentingweb. When they are angry,these parents are likely to spank their children with excessive force. However, many parents who use physicalpunishment are often caught up in their own emotions. Although it purports tobe a form of discipline, spanking does not succeed in teaching childrenlessons of right and wrong. Ironically, by using a violent and hurtful means of discipline, parentsare instilling negative values in their children. It is especially difficult for youngchildren to cope with the physical and emotional scars inflicted by theirparents whom they love and trust. It is little wonder that children are confusedwhen their parents who claim to love them are hitting them. Children who engage inaggressive behavior towards their friends and siblings are emulating theirparents' actions. Surveys conducted by MurrayStraus indicated that the likelihood of adults who were spanked as childrento physically attack their spouses was twice that of adults who were notspanked when they were children ("Five Good Reasons" 1). Available: www.cei.net/~rcox/body.html 2 September 2 . By inflicting violenceon young children whenever they make mistakes, parents will stunt thephysical, mental and emotional development of their children. Available: www.religioustolerance.org/spanking.html 2 September 2 ."Five Good Reasons to Stop Spanking Children." N/A: 1. By offering them a protectiveenvironment in which they can learn and grow through their successes andfailures, parents can help their children grasp the ethical complexity ofmany issues in life. Whenparents spank their children, they send a powerful message to theirchildren that violence is a way to respond to problems (Ramsburg 2). Most significantly, itshatters the natural bond between parent and child. Thiscauses children to learn that people can control the behavior ofdefenseless individuals by physically hurting them. In order for the childrento learn from their mistakes, parents have to demonstrate appropriatebehavior to their children. The specialbond between parents and children will be eroded away by the violent act ofspanking ("Five Good Reasons" 1). For parents who seek to teach their children positive values of love,kindness and compassion, the act of spanking cannot be morally justified asa correct way of action. "The Debate Over Spanking." ERIC Digest (March 1997): 1-5. Basically, it is immoralto spank children. Spanking children is an immoral act that should not be condoned. Online. It is Immoral to Spank Children Spanking is one of the most common methods of discipline used byparents. Online. Forchildren who were spanked, the avoidance of spanking served as theunderlying motive for their actions ("Five Good Reasons" 1). At the beginning of their journey, young children are apt to makemistakes and break rules as they learn about life. Instead of creating a loving environment for their children, parentswho spank their children instill a sense of fear and anger in them (Straus2). Religious Tolerance.Org. In order to inculcate strong moral values intheir children, it makes far greater sense for parents to displayappropriate behavior than to spank their children. Furthermore, the moral consequences of spanking childrenhas lifelong adverse effects. Itis wrong for any human being to harm a helpless child (Straus 2). Available: www.parentingweb.com/discipline/spankdebate.html 2 September 2 .Straus, Murray.

If this paper is not what you are looking for, you can search again:

Search for:


or

Click here to request an essay written just for you.



 
 

Dissertation Station
11270 Washington Blvd.
Culver City, CA 90230