A 

Abortion
Accounting
Advertising
Africa
African-American Studies
Aging
Agriculture
American Indian Studies
Anthropology
Archaeology
Architecture
Argumentative
Art: Artists (Alphabetized)
Art: General
Become an Affiliate and Earn $$$
Biographies (Alphabetized)
Book Reviews (Non-Fiction) (Alphabetized)
Business: Companies (Alphabetized)
Business: General
Business: Industries (Alphabetized)
Business: International
Business: Small
California
Canada
Caribbean
Child Abuse
China
Communication: Journalism
Communication: Language & Speech
Communication: Media
Communication: Non-Verbal
Communication: Television
Communication: Television & Children
Communism
Computer Science
Consumerism
Criminal Justice: General
Criminal Justice: Juvenile Delinquency
Criminal Justice: Police Science
Criminal Justice: Prisons
Cuba
Death & Dying: Euthanasia
Death & Dying: General
Death & Dying: Suicide
Drama: American
Drama: English
Drama: World
Drugs: Alcohol
Drugs: General
Economics: Banking
Economics: Economists (Alphabetized)
Economics: General
Economics: Inflation
Economics: International Trade
Economics: Macroeconomics
Economics: Microeconomics
Economics: Taxation
Education: Administration
Education: Curriculum
Education: General
Education: Higher
Education: Physical
Education: Psychology
Education: Reading
Education: Special
Education: Teaching Methods
Education: Theory
Energy: General
Energy: Nuclear
Energy: Solar
Environmental Studies
Evolution
Family & Marriage
Films: Artists (Alphabetized)
Films: General
Finance: Companies (Alphabetized)
Finance: General
Former Soviet Union: Post-1990
France
Gender & Sexuality
Geography
Germany
History: Ancient Greek & Roman
History: European
History: Great Britain
History: U.S. (After 1865)
History: U.S. (Before 1865)
History: U.S. Presidency
History: U.S. Presidents (Alphabetized)
Homosexuality
Immigration
India
Indonesia
International Relations: Arms Control
International Relations: Cold War
International Relations: Non-U.S.
International Relations: U.S.
Japan
Jewish Studies
Korea
Labor
Latin America
Law: Business
Law: Capital Punishment
Law: General
Law: International & Non-U.S.
Law: Supreme Court
Leadership
Literature, American: Authors (Alphabetized)
Literature, American: Faulkner
Literature, American: Fitzgerald
Literature, American: General
Literature, American: Hawthorne
Literature, American: Hemingway
Literature, American: Melville
Literature, American: Poe
Literature, American: Steinbeck
Literature, American: Twain
Literature, English: Authors (Alphabetized)
Literature, English: Chaucer
Literature, English: Conrad
Literature, English: Dickens
Literature, English: General
Literature, English: Joyce
Literature, English: Lawrence
Literature, English: Shakespeare
Literature, English: Swift
Literature, General: Children
Literature, General: Classic (Greek & Roman)
Literature, General: Russian
Literature, General: World
Management: General
Management: Japanese
Management: Motivation
Management: Theory
Management: Women
Marketing: Companies (Alphabetized)
Marketing: General
Marketing: Plans
Mathematics
Medical: Aids
Medical: Dentistry
Medical: Diseases & Disorders (Alphabetized)
Medical: General
Medical: Nursing
Mexican-American Studies
Mexico
Middle East: Egypt
Middle East: General
Middle East: O.P.E.C.
Military
Music: Classical
Music: General
Mythology
Nutrition
Parapsychology/Occult
Philosophy: Ancient Greek
Philosophy: Descartes
Philosophy: Eastern
Philosophy: General
Philosophy: Kant
Philosophy: Sartre
Poetry: American
Poetry: English
Poetry: Milton
Poetry: World
Political Science: Elections & Campaigns
Political Science: Foreign
Political Science: Lobbyists & Pressure Groups
Political Science: Machiavelli
Political Science: Mill
Political Science: Political Theory
Political Science: U.S.
Psychology: Behaviorism
Psychology: Child & Adolescent
Psychology: Disorders
Psychology: Dreams
Psychology: Experimental
Psychology: Freud
Psychology: General
Psychology: Jung
Psychology: Physiology
Psychology: Piaget
Psychology: Rogers
Psychology: Social
Psychology: Testing
Psychology: Therapies
Public Administration: General
Public Administration: Government Agencies (Alphabetized)
Racism
Real Estate
Recreation & Leisure
Religion: Eastern
Religion: General
Religion: Islam
Religion: The Bible
Research: Completed Studies (With Statistics & Results)
Research: Designs & Proposals
Research: Statistics & Methodology
Russia: Pre-1917 Revolution
Science: Astronomy
Science: Biology
Science: General
Science: Genetics
Sociology: Durkheim
Sociology: General
Sociology: Marx
Sociology: Social Problems
Sociology: Social Theory
Sociology: Social Welfare
Sociology: Weber
Soviet Union: 1917-1990
Sports: Drugs
Sports: General
Technology
Transportation: Automotive
Transportation: Aviation
Transportation: General
Transportation: Railroads
Urban Studies
Vietnam
Women Studies
 

SPENT NUCLEAR FUEL PROJECT.   Term Paper ID:29054 Click to get this paper

Essay Subject: Analyzes the SNFP at the Hanford site.... More...

6 Pages / 1350 Words 6 sources, 7 Citations, MLA Format $24.00 Return to List of Papers

Paper Abstract: Analyzes the SNFP at the Hanford site. Discusses purpose of this Department of Energy's project. Its goal to remediate the deteriorating spent nuclear fuel stored underwater. Background of the problem that led to the SNPF. Cites purpose and objectives of the SNFP. Analyzes its performance. 1 Chart. Paper Introduction: ANALYZING THE PERFORMANCE OF THE SPENT NUCLEAR FUEL PROJECT AT THE HANFORD SITE Introduction This research analyzes the Spent Nuclear Fuel Project (SNFP) at the Department of Energy’s Hanford Site at Richland, Washington. The purpose of the long-term project is to remediate the deteriorating spent nuclear fuel stored underwater in the K-Basins at the Hanford Site (United States Department of Energy 1). This research provides background information on the problem that led to the SNFP, provides detailed information on the SNFP, and analyzes the performance of the SNFP. Background on the Problem The designation “Hanford Site” refers to the parts of the Department of Energy’s Hanford Facility where spent nuclear f Text of the Paper: The entire text of the paper is shown below. However, the text is somewhat scrambled. We want to give you as much information as we possibly can about our papers and essays, but we cannot give them away for free. In the text below you will find that while disordered, many of the phrases are essentially intact. From this text you will be able to get a solid sense of the writing style, the concepts addressed, and the sources used in the research paper. Thedesignation "Hanford Site" also is the name given by the Department ofEnergy to the Department's contractor organization that acts as the projectmanager for the remediation activities of the SNFP. The projectmissed many of the scheduled completion times for specified objectives. The purposeof the long-term project is to remediate the deteriorating spent nuclearfuel stored underwater in the K-Basins at the Hanford Site (United StatesDepartment of Energy 1). The K-Basins are two storage areasconstructed as basins to contain the 177 storage tanks containing spentnuclear fuels (United States Department of Energy 3). This research provides background information onthe problem that led to the SNFP, provides detailed information on theSNFP, and analyzes the performance of the SNFP. Approximately 54million gallons (2 6, cubic meters) of high-level waste containingroughly 2 million curies of radioactivity are stored in 177 tanks atHanford (Jones 243). The Hanford K-Basins. This problem led to thecreation of the SNFP. Many sub-contractors appear to have under estimated the costs that they would incuron the project. Washington, D.C.: United States General Accounting Office, 8 October 1998.United States Department of Energy. The Spent Nuclear Fuels Project The spent nuclear fuels stored at the Hanford Site became an issuewhen many of the 177 storage tanks began leaking. The production of 7 , nuclear weapons over more than fifty years inthe United States created huge volumes of long-lived radioactive waste,decommissioning problems, and environmental concerns involving contaminatedland and water. These objectives are a part of a sub-projectdesignated as the Hanford Groundwater/Vadoze Zone Integration Project. Works CitedFioravanti, M., and Makhijani, A. "Testimony Before the Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations, Committee on Commerce, House of Representatives, Nuclear Waste - Schedule, Cost, and Management Issues at DOE's Hanford Tank Waste Project", GAO/T-RCED- 99-21. Another problem with the project management at the Hanford Site hasbeen the continually shifting political control at the United StatesDepartment of Energy. Under suchconditions, effective project management becomes almost impossible. The Hanford facility, built in the early-194 s in south centralWashington State, was a center of plutonium production for the UnitedStates nuclear weapons program. Washington, D.C.: United States Department of Energy, February 1996. Background on the Problem The designation "Hanford Site" refers to the parts of the Departmentof Energy's Hanford Facility where spent nuclear fuels are stored. The contractor,Hanford Site, is located in Richland, Washington and the Department ofEnergy owns the contractor. The formulation of the objectives of the SNFP at the Hanford Siteresulted from a tri-party agreement between the United States Department ofEnergy, the State of Washington, and the United States EnvironmentalProtection Agency. As an example, after the Tri-Party Agreementnegotiated during the Clinton Administration committed the federalgovernment to funding specific objectives on an agree timeline, the newBush Administration deleted billions of dollars from SNFP funding andattempted to unilaterally re-establish project goals (United StatesDepartment of Energy 9 ). The scale and complexity of the nuclearwastes at the Hanford Facility made the Hanford Site the most difficultremediation problem facing the United States government. The Department of Energy (DOE) is responsible for managing36 million cubic meters of radioactive and hazardous wastes in a wide arrayof forms and storage configurations. The Hanford Site project manager engagesprivate sector organizations as sub-contractors in the management of theSNFP (United States Department of Energy 2). The Tri-Party Agreement is a legally binding documentthat includes an action plan. Washington, D.C.: United States Department of Energy, June 1996.United States Department of Energy. Management of Spent Nuclear Fuel from the K-Basins at the Hanford Site DOE/EIS 245-IP. TheGantt chart on the following page illustrates the project objectives andtimelines for the attainment of the objectives. One of the major problems with the project management at the SNFPappears to be a faulty development of the scope for the project and the sub-projects of the SNFP. analyzing the performance of the spent nuclear fuel project at the hanford site Introduction This research analyzes the Spent Nuclear Fuel Project (SNFP) at theDepartment of Energy's Hanford Site at Richland, Washington. A third problem involved many of the sub-contractors. The action plan of the Tri-Party Agreementis the source of the objectives of the SNFP. The SNFP objectives apply toremediation efforts in both the River Corridor and the Central Plateauareas of the Hanford Site. Washington, D.C.: United States Department of Energy, August 2 2.United States Department of Energy. This situation did not include all sub-contractors.The situation involved a sufficient number of sub-contractors, however, tocause concern that the SNFP will ever be completed in a way that meets theproject's purpose. The operations at the Hanford Facility generated massive quantities ofhigh-level liquid waste containing fission products (such as technetium-99,cesium-137, and strontium-9 ) and residuals of plutonium, uranium, andother heavy radioactive elements. Negotiation and legal action by the State ofWashington led to a partial restoration of funds for the SNFP. The scope documents appear to be too general innature, a[pic]characteristic that allowed the Department of Energy to prepare a projectplan that appeared to satisfy the purpose of the SNFP, but which in realityprovided neither the funding nor the specificity required to permit sub-contractors to develop adequate project management plans for their sub-contracts. Weapons production and relatedactivities contaminated 79 million cubic meters of soil and almost twobillion cubic meters of groundwater (Fioravanti and Makhijani 28). Performance Management Plan for the Accelerate Cleanup of the Hanford Site, DOE/RL-2 2-47, Revision D. Analyzing the Performance of the SNFP Although the project management organization for the SNFP followedaccepted project management procedures in developing the project managementplan and schedule for the SNFP at the Hanford Site, performance on theproject has been mired in problems almost from its inception. Washington, D.C.: United States Department of Energy, October 1995.United States Department of Energy. To protect their financial positions, they curtailedprojected operations which led to failures to meet project objectives atthe scheduled times. L., United States General Accounting Office. Spent Nuclear Fuel Project. Takoma Park, Maryland: Institute for Energy and Environmental Research, October 1997.Jones, G. Thesefacilities chemically separated plutonium from uranium and from fissionproducts at the Hanford Facility from 1943 through 1963 (Fioravanti andMakhijani 24). The purpose of the SNFP is to protect the ColumbiaRiver by safely moving more than 2,1 metric tons of deteriorating spentnuclear fuel from the aging K Basins to safe, dry, interim storage in thecenter of Hanford the Hanford Site. The United States government constructednine plutonium production reactors and five reprocessing plants. Containing the Cold War Mess. If this paper is not what you are looking for, you can search again: Search for: or Click here to request an essay written just for you.