A 

Abortion
Accounting
Advertising
Africa
African-American Studies
Aging
Agriculture
American Indian Studies
Anthropology
Archaeology
Architecture
Argumentative
Art: Artists (Alphabetized)
Art: General
Become an Affiliate and Earn $$$
Biographies (Alphabetized)
Book Reviews (Non-Fiction) (Alphabetized)
Business: Companies (Alphabetized)
Business: General
Business: Industries (Alphabetized)
Business: International
Business: Small
California
Canada
Caribbean
Child Abuse
China
Communication: Journalism
Communication: Language & Speech
Communication: Media
Communication: Non-Verbal
Communication: Television
Communication: Television & Children
Communism
Computer Science
Consumerism
Criminal Justice: General
Criminal Justice: Juvenile Delinquency
Criminal Justice: Police Science
Criminal Justice: Prisons
Cuba
Death & Dying: Euthanasia
Death & Dying: General
Death & Dying: Suicide
Drama: American
Drama: English
Drama: World
Drugs: Alcohol
Drugs: General
Economics: Banking
Economics: Economists (Alphabetized)
Economics: General
Economics: Inflation
Economics: International Trade
Economics: Macroeconomics
Economics: Microeconomics
Economics: Taxation
Education: Administration
Education: Curriculum
Education: General
Education: Higher
Education: Physical
Education: Psychology
Education: Reading
Education: Special
Education: Teaching Methods
Education: Theory
Energy: General
Energy: Nuclear
Energy: Solar
Environmental Studies
Evolution
Family & Marriage
Films: Artists (Alphabetized)
Films: General
Finance: Companies (Alphabetized)
Finance: General
Former Soviet Union: Post-1990
France
Gender & Sexuality
Geography
Germany
History: Ancient Greek & Roman
History: European
History: Great Britain
History: U.S. (After 1865)
History: U.S. (Before 1865)
History: U.S. Presidency
History: U.S. Presidents (Alphabetized)
Homosexuality
Immigration
India
Indonesia
International Relations: Arms Control
International Relations: Cold War
International Relations: Non-U.S.
International Relations: U.S.
Japan
Jewish Studies
Korea
Labor
Latin America
Law: Business
Law: Capital Punishment
Law: General
Law: International & Non-U.S.
Law: Supreme Court
Leadership
Literature, American: Authors (Alphabetized)
Literature, American: Faulkner
Literature, American: Fitzgerald
Literature, American: General
Literature, American: Hawthorne
Literature, American: Hemingway
Literature, American: Melville
Literature, American: Poe
Literature, American: Steinbeck
Literature, American: Twain
Literature, English: Authors (Alphabetized)
Literature, English: Chaucer
Literature, English: Conrad
Literature, English: Dickens
Literature, English: General
Literature, English: Joyce
Literature, English: Lawrence
Literature, English: Shakespeare
Literature, English: Swift
Literature, General: Children
Literature, General: Classic (Greek & Roman)
Literature, General: Russian
Literature, General: World
Management: General
Management: Japanese
Management: Motivation
Management: Theory
Management: Women
Marketing: Companies (Alphabetized)
Marketing: General
Marketing: Plans
Mathematics
Medical: Aids
Medical: Dentistry
Medical: Diseases & Disorders (Alphabetized)
Medical: General
Medical: Nursing
Mexican-American Studies
Mexico
Middle East: Egypt
Middle East: General
Middle East: O.P.E.C.
Military
Music: Classical
Music: General
Mythology
Nutrition
Parapsychology/Occult
Philosophy: Ancient Greek
Philosophy: Descartes
Philosophy: Eastern
Philosophy: General
Philosophy: Kant
Philosophy: Sartre
Poetry: American
Poetry: English
Poetry: Milton
Poetry: World
Political Science: Elections & Campaigns
Political Science: Foreign
Political Science: Lobbyists & Pressure Groups
Political Science: Machiavelli
Political Science: Mill
Political Science: Political Theory
Political Science: U.S.
Psychology: Behaviorism
Psychology: Child & Adolescent
Psychology: Disorders
Psychology: Dreams
Psychology: Experimental
Psychology: Freud
Psychology: General
Psychology: Jung
Psychology: Physiology
Psychology: Piaget
Psychology: Rogers
Psychology: Social
Psychology: Testing
Psychology: Therapies
Public Administration: General
Public Administration: Government Agencies (Alphabetized)
Racism
Real Estate
Recreation & Leisure
Religion: Eastern
Religion: General
Religion: Islam
Religion: The Bible
Research: Completed Studies (With Statistics & Results)
Research: Designs & Proposals
Research: Statistics & Methodology
Russia: Pre-1917 Revolution
Science: Astronomy
Science: Biology
Science: General
Science: Genetics
Sociology: Durkheim
Sociology: General
Sociology: Marx
Sociology: Social Problems
Sociology: Social Theory
Sociology: Social Welfare
Sociology: Weber
Soviet Union: 1917-1990
Sports: Drugs
Sports: General
Technology
Transportation: Automotive
Transportation: Aviation
Transportation: General
Transportation: Railroads
Urban Studies
Vietnam
Women Studies
 

MENTALLY ILL OFFENDERS.   Term Paper ID:29112 Click to get this paper

Essay Subject: Punishment and treatment of criminal defendants.... More...

16 Pages / 3600 Words 24 sources, 68 Citations, APA Format $64.00 Return to List of Papers

Paper Abstract: Punishment and treatment of criminal defendants. Compares handling mentally disordered offenders (MDOs) in the U.S., Great Britain and Scandinavia. Differing legal systems, mental health policies and cultural values. Historical overview. Deinstitutionalization. Public attitudes. Criminalization of MDO treatment. Movement for legal reform and protection of civil rights of MDOs. Paper Introduction: PUNISHMENT/TREATMENT OF MENTALLY ILL OFFENDERS This research paper discusses and compares similarities and differences in the handling (punishment and/or treatment) of criminal defendants with mental disorders (mentally disordered offenders or MDOs) internationally, particularly in the United States, Great Britain and Scandinavia. In dealing with MDOs, all societies have faced the necessity of protecting society from their criminal actions while also attempting to cure/rehabilitate them. In general, custodial isolation in the interests of public safety has been given priority over mental health treatment, largely due to public fear of, and indifference toward, MDOs and gross disparities between their therapeutic needs and available resources and facilities. Due to their differing cultural values, legal systems and mental health policies, the Text of the Paper: The entire text of the paper is shown below. However, the text is somewhat scrambled. We want to give you as much information as we possibly can about our papers and essays, but we cannot give them away for free. In the text below you will find that while disordered, many of the phrases are essentially intact. From this text you will be able to get a solid sense of the writing style, the concepts addressed, and the sources used in the research paper. flooded the correctional system" (p.257). In a similar spirit,Congress passed the 1996 Prison Litigation Reform Act under which inmatesare barred from suing federal correctional authorities for psychologicaldamage unless they can prove they suffered physical damage as well. Nevertheless, "the treatment of MDOs has been andstill is plagued by inadequate funding and insufficient facilities" (Laing,p. Okasha, A., J. According to Mitka (2 1, June 6), "corrections officers in US jailsand prisons typically use punishment as a means of controlling the behaviorof mentally ill inmates with aggressive and disciplinary problems" (p.27 3). So long as doubtexists that MDOs, especially those who commit violent crimes, can be cured,"courts will go on sending psychopaths to prison as a punishment ratherthan to psychiatrists for a cure" (Hibbert, pp. 1 ). . Markowitz, R. 4 EHRR 188. 735). 14). The British system pragmatically balances thetherapeutic needs of MDOs (patients) with "accountability, public safety,and the interests of victims" (p. Law and psychiatry in Scandinavia in the198 s. The Circular American Approach to MDOs Pre-2 th century treatment. B. Approachestoward insanity acquittees: Comments on recent or proposedamendments to the Criminal Codes of Canada and Norway.International Journal of Law & Psychiatry, 18, 71-82. Oxford: Oxford University Press. (2 1, June 6). not guilty by reason ofinsanity when he was tried for his unsuccessful attempt to assassinatePresident Ronald Reagan, Kirwin said "America went berserk that Hinckleygot off" (p. In general, custodial isolation in the interests ofpublic safety has been given priority over mental health treatment, largelydue to public fear of, and indifference toward, MDOs and gross disparitiesbetween their therapeutic needs and available resources and facilities. In Sweden, a MDO can be committed to astate mental institution on the say-so of two doctors, one of whom must bea psychiatrist. Many MDOs are diverted to mentalinstitutions through various devices, as discussed below; however, thosewho are not so disposed of are so numerous that they place an impossibleburden on the nation's overcrowded correctional institutions. New York; Minerva Press. Irwin, J., V. Crann, M., & G. J. Morrissey. . Winick, B. In some states,special psychiatric boards have been set up for a like period to adjudgewhether and when the defendant can be released and on what conditions.California and a number of other states have adopted three strikes andother mandatory sentencing laws for repeat offenders and those who commitparticularly heinous crimes which greatly limit the ability of judges tosend MDOs to mental institutions rather than prison. 24). . Michigan Bar Journal, 166-17 . 136). (1997). According to Laing (1999), the anti-psychiatrist school of thought of those decades held that "the psychiatricsystem is no better than the prison . P. Streeter, P. Follow-up offorensic psychiatric legislation and clinical practice in Sweden1988 to 1995. (2 1, April 21). The roots of evil a social history of crime aspunishment. Different jurisdictionsadopted over time a variety of less restrictive rules, such as the NewHampshire Rule under which legal insanity is defined as a crime which "wasthe offspring or product of mental disease in the defendant," the DurhamRule: "an accused is not criminally responsible if his unlawful act was theproduct of mental disease or mental defect," the Irresistible Impulse Rule,the American Law Institute Rule, etc. A. In Sweden only fourpercent of MDOs are confined in psychiatric hospitals at any given time(Ojeslo, p. Lancet, 1272-1275. 1 ). Rome: United Nations. The mad, the bad, and the innocent.Boston: Little, Brown. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science,484, (pp. 758). Deinstitutionalization of MDO treatment. . Davies, R. Washington, D.C.: AmericanPsychiatric Press. That decision indicated inmates have no cause of action against astate unless they can prove that they have been victimized by deliberatestate indifference. . Romeo, 457 U.S. King, E. (2 ). Steadman, H., & J. Civil rights advocates won a series of landmark casesin the Supreme Court which "placed . . European Convention on Human Rights. Youngberg v. Harrington, S. Sartorius (Eds.), Ethics culture and psychiatryinternational perspectives (pp. In dealing with MDOs, all societies have faced the necessity ofprotecting society from their criminal actions while also attempting tocure/rehabilitate them. 119-132).Washington, D.C.: American Psychiatric Press. (1994, Winter). The insanity defense. Hibbert said that in Europe in theMiddle Ages "even raving lunatics [who had committed crimes] were sometimeshanged;" and "they were frequently flogged, to drive the devils out ofthem" (p. Science News, 137, 372-376. According to Harrington(1997, January-February), "there is little question that solitaryconfinement makes the psychotic even more psychotic" and "the more amentally ill offender is punished, the more out of control he becomes" (p.21). Advances in medical treatment ofmentally ill persons have enabled authorities in developed countries toconsider alternatives to conventional criminal punishment of MDOs; however,in most of Asia, Africa and Latin America the scarcity of psychiatrists,funds and facilities for treating MDOs condemns them to relative oblivion.For example, according to Liu (2 ), despite the enormous economicprogress China has made in the past quarter century, less than 11,57 psychiatrists serve more than a billion people (up from 1 in 195 ) (p.129). (1997, January-February). Holmberg,1999, March/April, p. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone. Since the 188 s the approach taken to MDOs inScandinavia (and also in Germany and other central European nations) hasadhered to the Marburg programme which "emphasized that more attentionshould be given to the personality factors and curability of the offender,and that management should consequently be more individualized" (Hoyer etal., 1995, p. American Journal of Sociology, 1 4, 1744-1769. Mental illness prevails in urbanjails. (1998, February). (1972). Social Justice, 27, 135-147. (2 ). Bower (199 , June 16) estimated that more thansix percent of all persons arrested for misdemeanors or felonies in Chicagosuffered from a severe mental disease, such as schizophrenia, bipolardisorder, depression or drug or alcohol addiction, two or three times therate in the general population (p. Kastrup, Dr. M. An April 28, 2 1 report of the British MedicalAssociation concluded that "limited medical resources, medical staffshortages, and poor prison management practices, were contributing to acrisis in prison health care" (Davies, 2 1, April 21, p. 78). (1991). in jails and poorhouses" (p. .. (1999, May) estimated that MDOs accounted for from five to 2 percent of all inmates in American jails (p. Shaw (Ed.)., The law and mental health: Research andpolicy. It has the highest rate of incarceration of any developed nation.Canada with about as many people as California has only about 25 percent asmany incarcerated (Irwin, p. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 484(pp. Goldman. Pathways to the management of mentally disordered offenders in thecriminal justice system, Publication 48. (2 , Summer).America's one million nonviolent prisoners. 239). BJS studies mentally ill inmates.Corrections Today, 63, 14-15. 118).When a federal jury found John Hinckley, Jr. Hafemeister & Petrila concluded that "the balancebetween the individual rights of the mentally disordered offender and thesecurity interests of the community has tended to shift back towards thelatter with regard to commitment and release decisions;" and "courts beganto expand the bases of retention and to extend maximum lengths of timeindividuals could be confined for treatment" (p. 166). International Journal of Law &Psychiatry, 21, 59-64. pathological behavior patterns lead to repeated and escalated levels of punishment, often culminating in segregation-- placement in special, nonmedical housing units used to segregate prisoners for punishment . A. Laing indicated that similar systems are in place inother British Commonwealth countries, including Canada and Australia (pp.311-312). P., & H. 147). (1998, Winter). Of America's 1.8 million inmates, approximately 1.2 million werenonviolent offenders (p. Kirwin, B. . 12 ). International Journal of Law & Psychiatry, 22, 125-131. Sartorius (Eds.). Annalsof the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 484, (pp. In both GreatBritain and the United States, the trend in the 2 th century was at firsttoward a more liberal legal definition of insanity as a defense to criminalprosecution. 144-154). Scandinavian mental health systems for MDOs are less legalistic thanin Britain or the United States. According to Laing, "mental health service provisionand care has always been regarded as the 'Cinderella' of the HealthServices of the country" (p. 45). 37). Under the M'Naghten Rule, a defendant could prevail with thedefense of insanity only if it could be shown that h/she "was laboringunder such a defect of reason, from disease of the mind, as not to know thenature and quality of the act he was doing; or, if he did know it, that hedid not know he was doing what was wrong" (Worth, p. (2 ). 7). The insanitydefense: Problems and prospects for studying the impact of legal reforms.In S. However, as Americansociety became less agricultural and rural and more industrial and urban,correctional system reformers such as Dorothea Dix urged that MDOs besegregated from society and that incarcerating them with ordinary criminalsin prisons was "subversive of the good order and discipline which should beobserved in every well-regulated prison" (Harrington, 1999, May, p. According to Harrington (1999, May), "itwas a widespread practice in eighteenth-century America to house insanepaupers, . She added that efforts toreintegrate nonviolent MDOs into their communities have been handicappedbecause "the public is increasingly fearful of the mentally ill in thecommunity" (p. Laing, J. 173). In S. Liska, A. According to Winick (1996), "a systems ofcommunity corrections has emerged" under which "defendants have beendiverted from the criminal justice system at entry point and redirectedtoward a variety of community treatment settings --drug rehabilitation . 14 ). 148). (1996, October). (1999, May).Modeling the relationship between the criminal justice and mental healthsystems. According to Hoyer et al., in Norway where aliberalized insanity standard is used, "mentally disordered accused personshave historically spent a longer time in custody when found not guilty byreason of insanity than if they were held criminally responsible" (p. Liskaet al. . 17). P. In 1998 the United States had in jail or prison 1.8 millionpersons, up from 5 , in the early 197 s (Irwin et al., 2 , Summer, p.135). 372). Sweden does not recognize the insanity defense but ratherhas a guilty but mentally ill verdict, under which MDOs are subject to avariety of sanctions, including "institutional psychiatric care [if theyare dangerous in "secure mental hospitals," noninstitutional psychiatriccare, such as mandatory attendance at alcohol and drug addiction clinics,or a fine" (Ojeslo, p. 14-15). Aspublic mental health facilities withered, private clinics often provedunwilling for safety or financial reasons to open their doors to dangerousand/or indigent MDOs. Laing said that the spirit which animated mental health reform, asevidenced by the Mental Health Acts of 1959 and 1983, is that MDOs shouldbe treated "with dignity and humanity and they should not be unnecessarilysubjected to the detrimental effects of custodial sentences and penalsanctions" (p. Dueto their differing cultural values, legal systems and mental healthpolicies, the United States, Great Britain and the Scandinavian nationshave pursued different approaches to MDOs; however, the criminal justicesystems of all three areas are moving in the direction of diverting MDOs asmuch as possible away from traditional modes of punishment and toward moreeffective treatment for their disorders. Public health policy andadministration was nationalized under the National Health Services Act of1946.As Anderson (1972) noted, "the entire population has virtually free accessto health services" (p. A Law Commission Report (1991) on MentallyIncapacitated Adults said that "efforts have been made to abandonstigmatizing terminology and practices and to encourage self determinationand respect for individual rights and responsibility" (p. Mitka, M. 21 (199 ), that in theinterests of maintaining security in its correctional institution a statemay under the Constitution forcibly medicate MDO inmates with antipsychoticdrugs. Hafemeister, T. ., and apoor visiting psychiatric service" (p. TheUnited States, Sweden and England. (1982). West. New bedlam: Jails-not psychiatrichospitals-now care for the indigent mentally ill.Humanist, 9, 9-17. 162). Progress has been made as a result of legal reforms enacted inAnglo-America and under the more medically-oriented Scandinavian systems ofdiversion. 135). E. They stated that "bydefault, the responsibility of caring for inmates suffering from mentalillnesses has fallen on federal, state and local correctional facilitiesacross the country" (p. Scandinavian approaches. Holmberg (1999, March/April). 1). . (2 1, August). The M'NaghtenRule is still the law in 15 American states; however, it came undercriticism as being too cerebral and unscientific. 1275). Care andtreatment of the mentally ill in the United States: Historical developmentand reform. Patients typically are hospitalizedin psychiatric hospitals for limited periods of time. 125). New York: Wiley. Harrington, P. As in the United States, the movement for legal reform and greaterprotection of the civil rights of MDOs has helped improve the provision ofmental health services. Incarceration of the mentally ill:Treatment or warehousing? Three states ban the defensealtogether. Philadelphia: Chelsea House.----------------------- 14 (1995). No class of criminals has posed more of a social dilemma than thoselaw breakers who are mentally unbalanced. White, & P. Others passed laws giving juries the option of findingdefendants guilty-but-mentally ill under which the defendant is sentencedto the same term in prison or a psychiatric facility as h/she would havereceived had h/she been found guilty but adjudged sane. The Medicare/Medicaid system introduced in 1965 provided formore generous reimbursement for outpatient than for in-hospital patientmental health care. Mentally disorderedoffenders in the criminal justice system. Hibbert, C. Belfrage, H. E., F. (1983). Introduction Winston Churchill said that "the mood and temper of the public withrespect to the treatment of crime and criminals is one of the mostunfailing tests of the civilisation of any country" (Hibbert, 1963, p.131). 12-27). 18-19). 41). For centuries they have beenregarded as a threat to society. Great Britain has a unitary government inwhich policy formulation is the function of Parliament even though policyimplementation is largely decentralized. Enwright. restrictions on using the mentalhealth system to remove individuals from the community" (Hafemeister &Petrila, p. 1 ). Many nonviolentMDOs are treated the same as common (mentally healthy) criminals. (1996). Hardened public attitudes toward dangerous MDOs. According to progressive reformers ofthe early 2 th century, MDOs were more likely to recover and becomerehabilitated if they were treated in an isolated but benign psychiatricenvironment. However, according to Morrissey & Goldman,"deinstitutionalized patients encountered the hostility and rejection ofthe general public and the reluctance of community mental health andwelfare agencies to assume responsibility for their care" (p. (pp. by their peers and by the prison system itself. 128). Treating thementally disordered offender: Society's uncertain, conflicted, and changingviews. A. 3 7 (1982).The conservative trend in Supreme Court sentiment is illustrated by theCourt's ruling in Washington v. In A. (199 , June 16). She said that despite increased emphasisand funding of mental health services for MDOs in recent decades,continuing problems include "the non-availability of [psychiatric] hospitalbeds . Bellar. (2 ). Scandinavian Approach Mentally health facilities in the nations of Scandinavia areadministered centrally as part of a comprehensive national (compulsorilyinsured) health program which has been in effect since 1955. Governments since 1979 have explicitly favoreddiversion of MDOs from prisons to therapeutic centers. New York:1Viking Press. The basic rule isthat their decisions will be upheld so long they are based on the exerciseof their professional judgment. British Approach There are many similarities and differences between British andAmerican approaches to MDOs. In many parts of the less developed world, MDOs languishuntreated in jails and prisons, as the United Nations has documented(United Nations Interregional Care and Justice Institute, 1993). (1963). 19). UK prison doctors warn thatprison health care is falling apart. Morrissey & Goldman(1986, March) said "public mental hospitals were transformed from small,therapeutic asylums into large, custodial institutions" (p. GreatBritain has conformed its laws with Article 5(4) of the European Conventionon Human Rights (1982) which states that "everyone who is deprived of hisliberty by arrest or detention shall be entitled to take proceedingsspeedily by a court and his release ordered if the detention is not lawful"(p. Nevertheless, steps have been taken to improve the situation. 1748). London: HerMajesty's Stationery Office. A. 74).In Sweden the courts must approve the release of a MDO who has beenclassified as high risk (Belfrage, H., & Rosa, M., 1998, Winter, p. 19). 119 mentallyincapacitated adults and decision-making: An overview. Okasha, J.Arboleda-Flores, & N. a horrifyingly inhumane . According to Stahl & West, thecumulative effect of the above developments, together with greatlyheightened public fears of rising rates of violent crime and massive cutsin funding of public mental health services at all levels of government inthe 198 s and 199 s was "a large influx of mentally ill offenders" onto thestreet (p. The primary aim of diversion programs in Scandinavia is"the reintegration and rehabilitation of the offender [through] thesocialization process" (Ojeslo, 1986, March, p. Sartorius (Eds.), Ethics culture and psychiatryinternational perspective (pp. Dalrymple, T. M. The right to refuse medical treatment.Washington, D. 322). Conclusion Even the nations with the most comprehensive public mental healthprograms for treating MDOs have fallen short of the standard enunciated byChurchill. 148). lack of cooperation between prisons and hospitals . Denmark established more than fifty years agothe first psychiatric facility in the world at Herstedvester which soughtto rehabilitate chronic offenders with mental disease and return them tosociety. Arboleda-Florez, & N. Petrila. (1986, March). According to Menninger (1968), "no one a hundred years ago believedmental illness to be curable" (p. United Nations Interregional Crime and Justice Institute (UNICRI).(1993). (1999, May). D. Efforts to Improve Treatment of MDOs in America The dominant reality in American jails and prisons is that the 'mad'are mixed with the 'bad.' There is a broad consensus among many persons inthe mental health and correctional communities that "the majority of [jailsand ] prisons are ill-equipped to deal with prisoners suffering from mentalillness" (Laing, p. In the days before psychotropic drugs were used on MDOs, defendantswho were found by juries to be not guilty by reason of insanity weregenerally held in state psychiatric hospitals for indefinite periods;however, Steadman & Morrissey (1986, March) said that as a result of theaforementioned Supreme Court decisions, "the public could no longer beassumed of long-term secure detention of insanity acquittees" (p. 5). By188 , the overwhelming majority (99.6 percent) of MDOs were confined instate psychiatric hospitals (p. The Swedish media in the 199 s criticized the Swedishmental health system for being too soft on criminals. Schiraldi, & J. Kirwin said that since the 197 s "a massive number ofmentally ill offenders have . 12 ). 1). Hafemeister & Petrila (1994, Winter) said "the criminaljustice and mental health systems were given broad discretion to quicklyand quietly remove a dangerous 'crazy' person from the community" (pp. .institution" (p. (1968). Morrissey, J. (1986, March). The scale of the British program isindicated by the existence of more than 2 diversion programs to serve apopulation only one third the size of the United States which has 25 suchprograms (p. Worth (2 ) said that the basic concept underlying theinsanity defense in criminal trials is that "it is unfair to hold personsresponsible for their acts when they do not know, or can't control whatthey're doing" (p. Jails and prisons are singularly ill-equipped to handle many MDOs.Streeter summarized the argument against sending MDOs to jails and prisonsas follows: Identifying and treating the mentally ill is especially difficult in the prison setting, where chronic and severely mentally disordered prisoners are often victimized, . The crime of punishment. Ethics and psychiatry in China. (1999). However, acquittal of MDOs by reason of insanityhas for centuries generated intense public misgivings. . Washington, D.C.:American Psychiatric Press. A. Liu, X. References Anderson, O. Stahl, E., & M. Caging the crazy:'Supermax' confinement under attack. A guide to the Mental HealthAct 1983. (1986, March). when the seriously mentally ill do not receive appropriate mental health treatment while in prison, they not only suffer unnecessarily--but also the family and friends who care for them; other prisoners who must suffer the consequences of being in their close proximity; and corrections staff and civilian employees. . 324). Shaw, S. Much, however, remains to be done inasmuch as practical andemotional constraints have too often left MDOs at the mercy of ill-equippedcorrectional officials and a largely indifferent or even hostile public. According to Harrington (1999, May),"there's a lack of political will to build mental hospitals" (p. 21). 26-27). Starved for funds, statemental institutions gradually decayed and became little more thanwarehouses for MDOs few of whom were rehabilitated. Laing defineddiversion as "a process of decision-making at various stages of thecriminal justice system whereby certain offenders are not prosecuted, ornot imprisoned, or not punished, but are identified and treated in adifferent way" (p. 115-126). Hoyer, G., D. Many MDOs have been resistent to medicaltreatment and prone to recidivism. These techniques do not work with MDOs whose conduct is bydefinition irrational in nature. Life at the bottom. 14). Even though the insanity defense rarely succeeds --inCalifornia on the average it did so in the 197 s only in five felony casesout of 1 , many states have recently tightened their insanity defenselaws (Steadman & Morrissey, p. . Journal of the American Medical Association, 285, 27 3-27 7. 166). C.: American Psychological Association. In A. Ziedenberg. Blueglass, R. Shaw (Ed.), The law and mental health: Research andpolicy. . Law Commission. (Ed.). Laingreported that "over 25 diversion schemes are operating at courtsthroughout the country" (p. . . Europe with a population in 1998 of 37 million incarcerated 3 , whereas the United States with a population of274 million incarcerated more than a million (Irwin et al., p. 59). PUNISHMENT/TREATMENT OF MENTALLY ILL OFFENDERS This research paper discusses and compares similarities anddifferences in the handling (punishment and/or treatment) of criminaldefendants with mental disorders (mentally disordered offenders or MDOs)internationally, particularly in the United States, Great Britain andScandinavia. Care or custody? . 166). 29). According toKastrup (2 ), Swedish health services "are almost entirely free, witheasy access to services, a very limited private health sector, and emphasison prophylactic health care" (p. (1986, March). The Swedish mentalhealth system features "multidisciplinary outpatient treatment, and a rangeof social psychiatric interventions such as drug centers and differentiatedliving centers" (p. Worth said until the M'Naghten Rule was adopted in England in1848, "no clear definition of legal insanity yet existed in English law"(p. 792-793). 46). 16). Lack of treatment frequently causes treatable conditions to worsen and become more difficult to attend to and ultimately the general public suffers (p. The Supreme Courtunder Chief Justices Warren Burger and William Rehnquist has increasinglytended to defer to the judgement of federal and state correctionalauthorities and/or psychiatric boards as to whether the continued retentionof a violent MDO is justified on public safety grounds. Worth, R. Consultation paper no. (Worth, pp. England and Wales follow theM'Naghten Rule as liberalized by the concept of diminished responsibility.Under the British system criminal suspects can be referred by police tomental hospitals for observation but in Scotland this is a function of thejudiciary.Orders for the involuntary committal of MDOs for treatment and theindeterminate sentencing of them after they have been acquitted on insanitygrounds is subject to an elaborate system of judicial safeguards. Florida State Law Review, 729-872. 68). Shaw (Ed.), The law and mental health: Research and policy. Humanist, 57, 14-25. Bower, B. 258). 73). Streeter(1998, February) said that in Michigan the number of prisoners in Michiganwho needed psychiatric treatment rose 23 percent 1994-1998 and that atleast 3 .7 percent of them needed such treatment (p. Meanwhile the development of psychotropic andantipsychotic medications rendered many such illnesses more manageable andmade it possible to return mentally ill persons, including MDOs, sooner tothe community. Chicago: Ivan R.Dee. He said that in suchfacilities, where MDOs are often held indefinitely, "staff view inmates asmonsters and treat them as such" (pp. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science,484, 1-198. In 1961 a federal JointCommission on Mental Illness and Health endorsed the concept of communitymental health care seed funding for which was provided under the CommunityMental Health Act of 1963. Health care: Can there be equity? . Menninger, K. Hopes in the 196 s that MDOs could be treated in community mentalhealth centers were dashed in the 197 s and 198 s. Ojeslo, L. 9).According to King (1999, October), only 61 percent of incarcerated MDOs inthe United States receive any mental health treatment at all (pp. 15).Sociologists such as Erving Goffman, psychiatrists such as Michael Foucaultand psychologists such as Thomas Szasz argued during the 196 s and 197 sthat mental hospitals were full of maladjusted people who had been wronglyconfined against their will. 16). (Ed.). L., & J. Michigan had 952mental health beds available for over 12, eligible patients (p. Harrington (1997, January-February) saidthat 36 states have special 'supermax' solitary confinement centers or'holes' for 'locking down' problem inmates (p. According toBlueglass (1983), the civil rights movement of the 196 s led "to a newperiod of criticism and disenchantment with what was regarded as medicalpaternalism and an excessive reliance on psychiatric judgment" as well as"a series of legal decisions which endorsed the rights to active treatmentof Mentally Disordered Persons" (p. 219-22 ). Stahl & West estimated that in 1998 about73 , MDOs were either in jails and prisons or on probation (p. Between 1955 and 1995 the number of MDOs who wereinstitutionalized in mental hospitals declined from about 559, to about69, (Stahl & West, 2 1, August, p. Many risk predictions withoutan instrument: Three years' experience of the new Swedish law onmentally disordered offenders. 1). Growing population ofmentally ill offenders redefines correctional facility design.Corrections Today, 72-77. H. . According toKirwin (1997), today "American jurisprudence recognizes no uniformdefinition of insanity" (p. . In S. Innovative program for mentally illinmates. Ethicsculture and psychiatry international perspective. Okasha, J.Arboleda-Florez, & N. A new ForensicPsychiatric law limits the availability of state psychiatrists to MDOs whoare adjudged to have a "severe mental disorder" (Crann, M., & G. 65-82). 2 1). Criminalization of MDO treatment. Critics of the British system argue that it is much too easy forcriminal offenders to avoid punishment on spurious mental health grounds.Dalrymple (2 1) said "the merest hint of a psychiatric history--a singleconsultation with a psychiatrist five years previously is enough--willexplain and excuse almost anything in the eyes of the police and justifiesa failure to prosecute" (p. programs, community mental health clinics, state mental hospitals, sexoffender programs, alcohol treatment programs," etc. 68). He said the treatment choices of mentally ill patients and theirfamilies in China are largely confined to traditional healers and witchdoctors (p. The law and mental health: Researchand policy. As in the United States, nevertheless, theprovision of public mental health services are, however, handicapped bybudgetary constraints. 11 & 53). Eaves, & W. (2 1). Harper, 494 U.S. 4). If this paper is not what you are looking for, you can search again: Search for: or Click here to request an essay written just for you.